Records and documents: William Oak
12 record images, oldest first. Move between them with the Previous and Next buttons or the arrow keys; zoom with + and −. Escape returns to William Oak.

Source: Vital Records of Marlborough (NEHGS, 1908); Internet Archive (public domain)
How it is shown: Complete page as supplied; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: What the page says: Confirmed from the page image, with the dates as printed: Ann, d. Natthaniel and Mary, Sept. 9, 1712; Gorge, s. Nathanil of Westbrow and Mary, Feb. 18, 1719-20; Hannah, Dec. 27, 1707; John, March 16, 1714-15; Jonathan, Aug. 21, 1717; Mary, March 31, 1710; Natthaniel, Jan. 7, 1703 (the year is printed 1703); William, Feb. 18, 1705; most with the note that the church record spells the name Oak. The same page prints 'OAK, Mary, bap. Nov. 29, 1741,' a different, later Mary, and later Oakes and Oaks families (Albert and Abigail; John and Experience) that are not Nathaniel's line. Whether these are our people: Likely, not Confirmed. The eight names, their birth order and the parents' names 'Natthaniel and Mary' match exactly the eight children the 1826 Worcester Magazine footnote gives to Nathaniel Oaks and Mary Holloway, and the tree holds the same eight; the page names no surname for Mary, and the tie to the tree's Nathaniel Oak(e) and Mary (Holloway) Oak rests on that match and the Marlborough place. William (b. 18 Feb 1705) is Likely the William Oakes of 18 who died in the 1723 Shrewsbury fire, by age alone. The 1741 baptism is not tagged. A caution on the date: Natthaniel's 7 Jan 1703 falls in the old-style January-to-March window, where a year written plainly as 1703 is often meant as 1703/4 in today's reckoning; the page does not say which the clerk meant. The parents' own Concord marriage, dated "March ye 2d 1703," carries the same ambiguity and is not independently resolved either (see the Nathaniel Oake story). This is a caution about reading the date, not a claim that one reading is correct.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); vitalrecordsofma00marl.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch.
Keep in mind: A printed transcription of the town's record, not the manuscript.
Evidence for: Vital Records of Marlborough, Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849 (1908), p. 142: 'John, s. Natthaniel and Mary, March 16, 1714-15' · the original at Internet Archive
Evidence for: Vital Records of Marlborough, Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849 (1908), births: 'Jonathan, s. Nathaniel and Mary, Aug. 21, 1717' · the original at Internet Archive
Image details

Source: FamilySearch, Probate records 1648-1924 (Middlesex County, Massachusetts), film 007553698, image 774.
How it is shown: Complete frame (original, unaltered); no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Transcribed (frames 766-782); a first reading was made. Confirmed: the eight children and the ordinals for John (seventh), Jonathan (fifth) and George (second). Likely: Anne (tenth) and Hannah (fifteenth). Not reliably read: the ages for Mary, Nathaniel and William. Date and sum Likely. Tagging the eight to the tree's persons rests on the names and the 1906 register order (Likely).
Image details

Source: Index to the Probate Records of the County of Middlesex, Massachusetts (1914), via the Internet Archive.
How it is shown: Complete page as saved from the Internet Archive scan; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Confirmed. An index prints name, residence, year, type and case number only; the eight children's tags rest on the case 16186 papers (the guardian's bond names all eight), matched by given name: Likely for each.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); vitalrecordsofma00marl.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Confirmed. The entry gives no age, parents, place or cause and does not mention the fire; the date is the day the fire's victims died (Boston News-Letter) and Marlborough is the Braggs' home town in the newspaper, so it is read as Abiel Bragg's death (inference). It does not name William Oakes.
Image details

Source: FamilySearch, Probate records 1648-1924 (Middlesex County, Massachusetts), film 007553698, image 782.
How it is shown: Complete frame (original, unaltered); no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Transcribed (frames 766-782); a first reading was made. Confirmed: heading and the allowance in outline. Likely: the sums (a balance of 146-0-10 less 67-9-6 gives 78-11-4, which the arithmetic confirms). Only Nathaniel, John, Mary and Anne are present or accounted for individually; William, Jonathan, George and Hannah are named only in the heading.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); historyofcountyo00whit.
How it is shown: CROP of the page image (the upper part of the printed page, down to the line ending 'were work-'); the full-page image is not held in the folder; no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Confirmed. Whitney says he is quoting the Boston paper of 15 Aug 1723. Whitney prints the surname Oaks; Ward (1847) prints 'William Oakes, 16'. Whitney's 'only Newspaper' is wrong (the Gazette and the Courant also ran). The identification of the apprentice as the son of Nathaniel Oak(e), b. 18 Feb 1705, is Hudson's (1862, p. 426) and is Likely, not proven.
Evidence for: Boston News-Letter of 15 Aug 1723 as reprinted by Whitney 1793: 'An exact account of the awful burning of Capt. John Keyes's house, with five persons in it, at Shrewsbury, in the night between the 7th and 8th of this inst.' ... 'Mr. Bragg aforesaid, the carpenter, with his brother Abiel, of 17 years of age, and William Oaks of 18, his apprentices, were working about it.'
Image details

Source: The Worcester Magazine and Historical Journal, vol. 2, Worcester, 1826; Internet Archive (public domain).
How it is shown: Complete page as supplied; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: What the page says: Confirmed. The footnote says Nathaniel Oaks came from England; married Mehitabel, daughter of John Rediet, who died 25 Nov 1702 without children; his second wife Mary was a daughter of Adam Holloway; the children were Nathaniel (of Bolton), William (burned at Shrewsbury in Capt. Keyes's house), Hannah (m. Gershom Fay Jr., d. 8 Mar 1806), Mary (m. Daniel Maynard, Marlborough), Ann (m. David Maynard, Westborough), John, Jonathan (removed to Harvard) and George. The text says nothing of a shipwreck, a cabin boy or a catamount; it is a printed account of 1826, not a contemporary record. Whether these are our people: the page names Nathaniel Oaks of Marlborough, his two wives and his children, and the tree holds the same parents and the same eight children with the same spouses (Likely for each child, since the tie to Nathaniel rests on this 1826 account). That the 'William' of the footnote is the William Oakes aged 18 named in the Boston News-Letter of 15 Aug 1723 is Likely, not Confirmed: the footnote is a later secondary account. Not tagged: John Rediet and the other people named on the page.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); worcestermagazi00unkngoog.
How it is shown: Complete page image; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Confirmed on the page image: 'of 18'. A second Internet Archive copy (Allen County copy) is so faint that its text comes out as 'of 10'; that is a scanning artifact, not the print. The footnote on this page calls Ebenezer Bragg father of the late Deacon John Bragg. The text is Ward's quotation of Whitney, not an independent reading of the 1723 paper.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); historyoftownofs00ward_2.
How it is shown: Complete page, rendered from the Internet Archive PDF (BPL copy); no crop, no retouch, no search highlight; the library stamp is on the original.
Keep in mind: Confirmed on the page images of three copies (BPL, NYPL, LoC): 'William Oakes, 16'. Ward's own 1826 text and Whitney give 18; Ward 1847 does not say where 16 comes from, so 16 is an unsourced variant. The footnote says 'the night of the 7th'. The page carries a library ownership stamp. The identification of the apprentice as Nathaniel Oak(e)'s son William is Hudson's (1862, p. 426), Likely.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); historyoftownofm00huds.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch.
Keep in mind: A printed book, not an original record.
Evidence for: Charles Hudson, History of the Town of Marlborough (1862), genealogy of Oakes, p. 426: 'William, b. Feb. 18, 1705; burned to death at Shrewsbury in the house of Capt. Keyes.' · the original at Internet Archive
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); essexantiquarian11perluoft.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Confirmed. The page does not name William Oakes: it records the carpenter's family and the death of his brother Abiel in the 1723 Shrewsbury fire in which William died. It cites no source for the fire (a footnote credits a contributor, Charles L. Clarke, New York City), calls Abiel 'She' (an evident error), and Abiel's 'about 1706' is derived from the newspaper's 'of 17 Years' (not an Ipswich birth record).
Image details