Records and documents: Jonathan Oak
34 record images, oldest first. Move between them with the Previous and Next buttons or the arrow keys; zoom with + and −. Escape returns to Jonathan Oak.

Source: Vital Records of Marlborough (NEHGS, 1908); Internet Archive (public domain)
How it is shown: Complete page as supplied; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: What the page says: Confirmed from the page image, with the dates as printed: Ann, d. Natthaniel and Mary, Sept. 9, 1712; Gorge, s. Nathanil of Westbrow and Mary, Feb. 18, 1719-20; Hannah, Dec. 27, 1707; John, March 16, 1714-15; Jonathan, Aug. 21, 1717; Mary, March 31, 1710; Natthaniel, Jan. 7, 1703 (the year is printed 1703); William, Feb. 18, 1705; most with the note that the church record spells the name Oak. The same page prints 'OAK, Mary, bap. Nov. 29, 1741,' a different, later Mary, and later Oakes and Oaks families (Albert and Abigail; John and Experience) that are not Nathaniel's line. Whether these are our people: Likely, not Confirmed. The eight names, their birth order and the parents' names 'Natthaniel and Mary' match exactly the eight children the 1826 Worcester Magazine footnote gives to Nathaniel Oaks and Mary Holloway, and the tree holds the same eight; the page names no surname for Mary, and the tie to the tree's Nathaniel Oak(e) and Mary (Holloway) Oak rests on that match and the Marlborough place. William (b. 18 Feb 1705) is Likely the William Oakes of 18 who died in the 1723 Shrewsbury fire, by age alone. The 1741 baptism is not tagged. A caution on the date: Natthaniel's 7 Jan 1703 falls in the old-style January-to-March window, where a year written plainly as 1703 is often meant as 1703/4 in today's reckoning; the page does not say which the clerk meant. The parents' own Concord marriage, dated "March ye 2d 1703," carries the same ambiguity and is not independently resolved either (see the Nathaniel Oake story). This is a caution about reading the date, not a claim that one reading is correct.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); vitalrecordsofma00marl.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch.
Keep in mind: A printed transcription of the town's record, not the manuscript.
Evidence for: Vital Records of Marlborough, Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849 (1908), p. 142: 'John, s. Natthaniel and Mary, March 16, 1714-15' · the original at Internet Archive
Evidence for: Vital Records of Marlborough, Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849 (1908), births: 'Jonathan, s. Nathaniel and Mary, Aug. 21, 1717' · the original at Internet Archive
Image details

Source: FamilySearch, Probate records 1648-1924 (Middlesex County, Massachusetts), film 007553698, image 774.
How it is shown: Complete frame (original, unaltered); no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Transcribed (frames 766-782); a first reading was made. Confirmed: the eight children and the ordinals for John (seventh), Jonathan (fifth) and George (second). Likely: Anne (tenth) and Hannah (fifteenth). Not reliably read: the ages for Mary, Nathaniel and William. Date and sum Likely. Tagging the eight to the tree's persons rests on the names and the 1906 register order (Likely).
Image details

Source: Index to the Probate Records of the County of Middlesex, Massachusetts (1914), via the Internet Archive.
How it is shown: Complete page as saved from the Internet Archive scan; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Confirmed. An index prints name, residence, year, type and case number only; the eight children's tags rest on the case 16186 papers (the guardian's bond names all eight), matched by given name: Likely for each.
Image details

Source: FamilySearch, Probate records 1648-1924 (Middlesex County, Massachusetts), film 007553698, image 782.
How it is shown: Complete frame (original, unaltered); no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Transcribed (frames 766-782); a first reading was made. Confirmed: heading and the allowance in outline. Likely: the sums (a balance of 146-0-10 less 67-9-6 gives 78-11-4, which the arithmetic confirms). Only Nathaniel, John, Mary and Anne are present or accounted for individually; William, Jonathan, George and Hannah are named only in the heading.
Image details

Source: FamilySearch, Probate records 1648-1924 (Middlesex County, Massachusetts), film 7554526, image 279.
How it is shown: Complete image; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight. The facing page (p. 504) belongs to other estates.
Keep in mind: The interlined correction above the signature line and the clerk's abbreviation of 'Entred' are doubtful. The judge's signature does not appear in this order. The right-hand page (p. 504) is other estates, not the Oak family. 500 to the upper part of p. 503 and that p. 499 and the top of p. 500 are another estate.
Image details

Source: FamilySearch, Probate records 1648-1924 (Middlesex County, Massachusetts), film 7554526, image 278.
How it is shown: Complete image; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Names, birth order and sums read clearly; spellings of some abutters (Rediat, Macholster, Eager) are uncertain. The page does not name William; the guardianship papers name eight children in 1722 and this return names seven living by 1729. 500 to the upper part of p. 503 and that p. 499 and the top of p. 500 are another estate.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); indextoprobatere03mass.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Confirmed. An index prints only name, residence, year, type and case number: no parentage, guardian or heir. The links to Jonathan b. 1717 (guardianship 1732), George b. 1719/20 (1734) and John (1715-1752) (1752) rest on name, place and age (Likely). The three 1752 guardianships (Hanah, Levina, Nathaniell) match three surviving children of John and Susanna of Westborough. Further parties tagged on 4 Oct 2026: Hannah Oake (born 1749); Leviner Oake (born 1745) (index lines 1752 Hanah and 1752 Levina, Westborough, guardianship (Likely: the two daughters of John and Susannah)).
Image details

Source: FamilySearch, Worcester. Probate Records 1731-1770, image 48.
How it is shown: Cropped to the two-page document image: the FamilySearch viewer's menus, account name and machine-transcript panel are removed; no retouch of the document, no search highlight. The saved original screenshot stays private.
Keep in mind: A viewer capture of the spread, not an original file. FamilySearch's own machine transcript (which reads 1782) was not relied on. Ties the boy Jonathan to Nathaniel's estate in 1732; it does not tie him to the later Jonathan of Harvard and Canaan (that rests on the 1906 register). Further parties tagged on 4 Oct 2026: Nathaniel Oak(e) (first record 1686; died 1720/21) (the father named on the page: 'son of Nathaniel Oak late of Westborough' (Likely)). Re-released 4 Oct 2026 as a crop of the document image only, replacing the full viewer screenshot.
Evidence for: Worcester County probate records, vol. 1, pp. 58-59: Jonathan Oak, a minor aged about fifteen, son of Nathaniel Oak late of Westborough, husbandman, deceased, names Jonathan Forbush of Westborough as guardian, 11 Aug 1732; acknowledged before John Chandler, Judge of Probate (screenshot captures of the viewer saved; the viewer's transcript reads 1782 for 1732). · the original at FamilySearch, Worcester, Massachusetts. Probate Records 1731-1770 (Full-Text Search), image 48 of 832
Image details

Source: Worcester County (Massachusetts) Probate Court docket book, via FamilySearch.
How it is shown: Complete two-page spread; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Confirmed as the clerk's docket entries. A docket abstract: it gives no petition text and usually no parentage; identities of the Oak entries rest on name, place and year (Likely) as stated below. Jonathan (1732) is Jonathan Oak, born 1717, who chose Jonathan Forbush as guardian on 11 Aug 1732 (Confirmed independently by the Worcester probate record, vol. 1, pp. 58-59); Levina is Leviner Oake (born 1745), daughter of John and Susannah (Likely). Case 44123 (Lydia Oak of Northborough, a land partition) is not identified with this family.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); vitalrecordsofst00stow.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Confirmed. An intention only: no residence, marriage date or parentage is printed. Whether this Jonathan is Jonathan b. 1717 of Marlborough (the tree's chain: Westborough guardianship 1732, Stow 1748/9, Harvard 1749-1771, Canaan) is Unconfirmed; the chain is inference from names and dates.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); vitalrecordsofha00harv.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch.
Keep in mind: A printed transcription of the town's record, not the manuscript.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); vitalrecordsofha00harv.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch.
Keep in mind: A printed transcription of the town's record, not the manuscript.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); vitalrecordsofha00harv.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch.
Keep in mind: A printed transcription of the town's record, not the manuscript.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); historyoftownofh1732nour.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Confirmed. The seating reflects tax standing, not age; no other Oak name is on the page. Identification with Jonathan Oak b. 1717 of Marlborough rests on the Oak register (1906) and the tree's chain (Westborough, Stow, Harvard, Canaan), not on this page (Unconfirmed).
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); historyofoldtown00hans.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Confirmed. Note (10) on p. 136 corrects 'John' to 'Jonathan' for this entry only; Hanson's narrative on pp. 127-128 still says 'John Oakes'. Identification with Jonathan Oak b. 1717 of Marlborough rests on the Oak register (1906) and the tree's chain (Westborough, Stow, Harvard, Canaan), not on this page (Unconfirmed).
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); historyofoldtown00hans.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Confirmed. The correction is attached to the 1781 list only. Identification with Jonathan Oak b. 1717 of Marlborough rests on the Oak register (1906) and the tree's chain (Westborough, Stow, Harvard, Canaan), not on this page (Unconfirmed).
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); probaterecordsof00main.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch.
Keep in mind: A printed abstract of the probate records, not the manuscript.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); probaterecordsof00main.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch.
Keep in mind: A printed abstract of the probate records, not the manuscript.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); probaterecordsof00main.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch.
Keep in mind: A printed abstract of the probate records, not the manuscript.
Image details

Source: The Worcester Magazine and Historical Journal, vol. 2, Worcester, 1826; Internet Archive (public domain).
How it is shown: Complete page as supplied; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: What the page says: Confirmed. The footnote says Nathaniel Oaks came from England; married Mehitabel, daughter of John Rediet, who died 25 Nov 1702 without children; his second wife Mary was a daughter of Adam Holloway; the children were Nathaniel (of Bolton), William (burned at Shrewsbury in Capt. Keyes's house), Hannah (m. Gershom Fay Jr., d. 8 Mar 1806), Mary (m. Daniel Maynard, Marlborough), Ann (m. David Maynard, Westborough), John, Jonathan (removed to Harvard) and George. The text says nothing of a shipwreck, a cabin boy or a catamount; it is a printed account of 1826, not a contemporary record. Whether these are our people: the page names Nathaniel Oaks of Marlborough, his two wives and his children, and the tree holds the same parents and the same eight children with the same spouses (Likely for each child, since the tie to Nathaniel rests on this 1826 account). That the 'William' of the footnote is the William Oakes aged 18 named in the Boston News-Letter of 15 Aug 1723 is Likely, not Confirmed: the footnote is a later secondary account. Not tagged: John Rediet and the other people named on the page.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); historyofoldtown00hans.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch.
Keep in mind: A printed book, not an original record.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); historyofoldtown00hans.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch.
Keep in mind: A printed book, not an original record.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); maninearnestlife00coll.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch.
Keep in mind: A printed book, not an original record.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); maninearnestlife00coll.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch.
Keep in mind: A printed book, not an original record.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); historygenealogy00cona.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch.
Keep in mind: A printed book, not an original record.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); oakoaksoakesfami00oakh.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch.
Keep in mind: A printed book, not an original record.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); oakoaksoakesfami00oakh.
How it is shown: Complete page as supplied; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Family tradition, as the family compilation prints it; the book itself adds that no official record of his military service has been found. Not independent proof. Label: Unconfirmed.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); oakoaksoakesfami00oakh.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch.
Keep in mind: A printed book, not an original record.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); oakoaksoakesfami00oakh.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch.
Keep in mind: A printed book, not an original record.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); oakoaksoakesfami00oakh.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch.
Keep in mind: A printed book, not an original record.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); oakoaksoakesfami00oakh.
How it is shown: Complete page as supplied; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: A family-written compilation. The tree has Nathaniel (2) born 1703; the register prints 7 June 1704.
Image details

Source: Copy supplied by American Ancestors (NEHGS), Mss 865, Box 9, folder 2
How it is shown: Complete page as supplied; no crop, no retouch.
Keep in mind: A typed copy made by someone other than John Conant, who wrote the note; who typed it and when is not known. Family tradition.
Image details

Source: Copy supplied by American Ancestors (NEHGS), Mss 865, Box 9, folder 2
How it is shown: Complete page as supplied; no crop, no retouch. Rotated upright from the sideways scan; nothing else changed.
Keep in mind: A typed copy made by someone other than John Conant, who wrote the note; who typed it and when is not known. Family tradition.
Image details