Mary Holloway: three marriages and a working widow
On August 12, 1736, the Rev. Ebenezer Parkman of Westborough, Massachusetts, wrote in his diary that he "rode over to the Widow (Mary) Rice (at Mr. Oakes) and prevailed with her to come to take care of my House when Deborah should go away." The editors' footnote to the entry cites the marriage of Thomas Rice to the widow Mary Oakes on July 2, 1722. The woman Parkman asked was probably Mary Holloway, then about fifty-four, who had already outlived Nathaniel Oake and Thomas Rice and would later marry John Fay.
A Concord girl in a Marlborough farm family
Mary was born at Concord on February 25, 1681/2, the daughter of Adam Holloway. The family genealogies identify her mother as Hannah Hayward, previously married to Jacob Farrar, who is reported to have been killed on August 22, 1675. Concord records the marriage of Adam Holloway and Hannah on March 5, 1680/81, almost a year before Mary's birth, so she was probably Mary's mother.

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); concordmassachus1635conc.
How it is shown: Complete page as supplied; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: A printed transcription; the day-month-year digits are printed in the old style ('5. 1. 81') and were first read as 5 January 1681/2; the record prints no month name, and in the old Massachusetts calendar (first month March) the reading is 5 March 1680/81.
Image details
Some printed accounts, including a 1905 county history and the 1906 Oak register (p. 7), give Jacob Farrar's widow as Mary herself, which the dates rule out.

Source: Genealogical and Family History of the County of Jefferson, New York, vol. I (New York and Chicago: Lewis Publishing Co., 1905), pp. 144-145, archive.org item genealogicalfami01oake, leaf n196.
How it is shown: Complete image as saved; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: A printed family history; later generations are not linked from this page.
Image details
The cited family records appear to connect Mary's sister Hannah with Jonathan Furbush, her sister Elizabeth with Joseph Wheeler, and her brother William Holloway with the lieutenant at Northborough. Her father, Adam, lived to be about eighty and died in June 1733; Westborough's return gives the 9th, a Northborough history the 7th.

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); concordmassachus1635conc.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Confirmed. The surname is spelled Holaway on this page (Holloway on p. 24).
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); concordmassachus1635conc.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Confirmed. The first month is March in the old-style year, which agrees with Pierce's 'March 5. 1681'.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); genealogicalfami01oake.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch.
Keep in mind: A printed book, not an original record.
Image details

Source: Digital Commonwealth / Westborough Public Library (public domain).
How it is shown: Complete image (full-size IIIF JPEG); no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Confirmed as read at full size. The final entry is in a paler, different hand (probably added later) and is unqualified: no 'Sr.', age or parentage. The same slip records the death of a different Adam, son of William and Mary, on 27 Dec 1732, so the June 1733 Adam is the elder man only by inference from other sources. The name of the 1732 daughter reads 'Botty' or Betty. The gravestone, as copied by De Forest (1891) and Kent (1921), reads 7 June: unreconciled.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); northboroughhist00inkent.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Confirmed. Kent's transcription, not the stones themselves. Adam's 7 June differs from the Westborough loose return's 9 June (unreconciled). Adam's age ('in ye 80th year') puts his birth about 1653-54.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); historyofwestborm00defo.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Confirmed. De Forest does not use the word 'gravestone' (it is Kent, 1921, p. 238, that prints the inscription). The date 7 June differs from the Westborough loose return (9 June); the two are unreconciled.
Image details
Nathaniel Oake, 1703
Concord's town record of the marriage of Nathaniel Oakes of Marlborough and Mary Holloway is dated "March ye 2d 1703" (page 60 of the 1895 Concord volume). Nathaniel's first wife, Mehitable Rediat, had died on November 25, 1702. The year form of the Concord date, 1702/3 or 1703/4, is not settled. Later histories, among them the 1906 Oak register (p. 7), give May 20, 1703, but no contemporary record supporting that date has been found.

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); concordmassachus1635conc.
How it is shown: Complete page as supplied; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: A printed transcription of the town record, not the manuscript. Confirmed as printed: 2 Mar 1703 (the family register says 20 May 1703). The bride's surname is printed Haleway (Holloway).
Image details

Source: record image attached to a citation
Image details
Mary and Nathaniel had eight children: Mary, Anne, John, Jonathan, George, Nathaniel, William and Hannah. William was born on February 18, 1705, John in March 1714/15 and Jonathan on August 21, 1717. William was probably the apprentice William Oakes who died in the Shrewsbury fire in August 1723. Nathaniel died about February 17, 1720/21 (the inventory's own day digit is unclear), leaving an estate inventoried at £835 15s. Mary administered the estate; her account survives. In early February 1721/2 Jonathan Furbush, her sister's husband, took guardianship of the eight children.

Source: Vital Records of Marlborough (NEHGS, 1908); Internet Archive (public domain)
How it is shown: Complete page as supplied; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: What the page says: Confirmed from the page image, with the dates as printed: Ann, d. Natthaniel and Mary, Sept. 9, 1712; Gorge, s. Nathanil of Westbrow and Mary, Feb. 18, 1719-20; Hannah, Dec. 27, 1707; John, March 16, 1714-15; Jonathan, Aug. 21, 1717; Mary, March 31, 1710; Natthaniel, Jan. 7, 1703 (the year is printed 1703); William, Feb. 18, 1705; most with the note that the church record spells the name Oak. The same page prints 'OAK, Mary, bap. Nov. 29, 1741,' a different, later Mary, and later Oakes and Oaks families (Albert and Abigail; John and Experience) that are not Nathaniel's line. Whether these are our people: Likely, not Confirmed. The eight names, their birth order and the parents' names 'Natthaniel and Mary' match exactly the eight children the 1826 Worcester Magazine footnote gives to Nathaniel Oaks and Mary Holloway, and the tree holds the same eight; the page names no surname for Mary, and the tie to the tree's Nathaniel Oak(e) and Mary (Holloway) Oak rests on that match and the Marlborough place. William (b. 18 Feb 1705) is Likely the William Oakes of 18 who died in the 1723 Shrewsbury fire, by age alone. The 1741 baptism is not tagged. A caution on the date: Natthaniel's 7 Jan 1703 falls in the old-style January-to-March window, where a year written plainly as 1703 is often meant as 1703/4 in today's reckoning; the page does not say which the clerk meant. The parents' own Concord marriage, dated "March ye 2d 1703," carries the same ambiguity and is not independently resolved either (see the Nathaniel Oake story). This is a caution about reading the date, not a claim that one reading is correct.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); vitalrecordsofma00marl.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch.
Keep in mind: A printed transcription of the town's record, not the manuscript.
Image details

Source: FamilySearch, Probate records 1648-1924 (Middlesex County, Massachusetts), film 007553698, image 772.
How it is shown: Complete frame (original, unaltered); no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Transcribed (frames 766-782); a first reading was made. Likely: descriptions Likely, amounts only partly read, and the pairing of several amounts with names is not reliable. The closing allowance, balance and date were not recovered. A line read 'Nathanell & William Oke' is Likely only, and whether it means two sons is unknown. Further parties tagged on 4 Oct 2026: Adam Holloway (1655–1733) (creditor 'to Adam Holloway' in Mary Oke's account (Likely reading in the transcription; Adam Holloway, Mary's father)).
Image details

Source: FamilySearch, Probate records 1648-1924 (Middlesex County, Massachusetts), film 007553698, image 768.
How it is shown: Complete frame (original, unaltered); no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Transcribed (frames 766-782); a first reading was made. Confirmed: heading, the year '1720-21' and the figures (a separate addition of the 20 lines gives 835-15-0). Likely: the day figure '17th' (the 7 carries a tick) and the item wording. The line 'inventory taken may [2?]th 17[2?]' is only partly legible; the appraisers were sworn 23 May 1721 (frame 767). The funeral-charges line and the notes below it are not reliably read.
Image details

Source: FamilySearch, Probate records 1648-1924 (Middlesex County, Massachusetts), film 007553698, image 774.
How it is shown: Complete frame (original, unaltered); no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Transcribed (frames 766-782); a first reading was made. Confirmed: the eight children and the ordinals for John (seventh), Jonathan (fifth) and George (second). Likely: Anne (tenth) and Hannah (fifteenth). Not reliably read: the ages for Mary, Nathaniel and William. Date and sum Likely. Tagging the eight to the tree's persons rests on the names and the 1906 register order (Likely).
Image details
Thomas Rice, 1722
Five months after the guardianship, on July 2, 1722, Marlborough recorded the marriage of "OAKE [Wid.], Mary of Westbrough and Thomas Rice." Westborough's record of the same day reads "Thomas and Mary Oakes, July 2, 1722. In Marlborough." The older Thomas Rice had a living wife, Anna, until 1731. Mary's husband was therefore probably Thomas Jr., born in 1683 to Thomas and Anna.
![Vital Records of Marlborough (1908), Marriages, p. 293: 'OAKE [Wid.], Mary of Westbrough and Thomas Rice, July 2, 1722' and 'OKE [Oak, C.R.], Nathanel and Tabatha Rice, Feb. 20, 1726-7' (the C.R. note means the church record gives the name as Oak).](/media/e5457b12f5ddd/display.jpg)
Source: Vital Records of Marlborough (NEHGS, 1908); Internet Archive (public domain)
How it is shown: Complete page as supplied; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: What the page says: Confirmed from the page image. Under OAKE the entry reads 'OAKE [Wid.], Mary of Westbrough and Thomas Rice, July 2, 1722'; under OKE, 'Nathanel and Tabatha Rice, Feb. 20, 1726-7'; the other Oak, Oakes and Oaks marriages on the page are those of later men (Ebenezer 1846 and 1848, Almira 1824, Beriah 1804, Daniel 1783, George 1765, Sarah 1741). The page names no first husband for the widow Mary. Whether these are our people: Likely, not Confirmed. Mary, a widow of Westborough, matches the tree's Mary (Holloway) Oak, widow of Nathaniel Oak(e), who the tree has remarrying Thomas Rice, but the page itself does not say whose widow she was; the match rests on the name, the widow's status, the date, Westborough and the tree's own marriage to Thomas Rice. 'Nathanel Oke and Tabatha Rice' matches the tree's Nathaniel Oak (b. 1703) and Tabitha Rice (the tree's son of Nathaniel and Mary), by names and date. The other Oak entries on the page are not tagged.
Image details
![Vital Records of Marlborough (1908), Marriages, p. 304, under RICE: 'Thomas and [Wid.] Mary Oake of Westbrough, July 2, 1722' and 'Tabatha and Nathanel Oke, Feb. 20, 1726-7', the same two marriages as on p. 293 indexed from the Rice side.](/media/eb3b38f1551ac/display.jpg)
Source: Vital Records of Marlborough (NEHGS, 1908); Internet Archive (public domain)
How it is shown: Complete page as supplied; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: What the page says: Confirmed from the page image. The Rice list repeats the 2 July 1722 marriage of Thomas Rice and the widow Mary Oake of Westborough and the 20 Feb 1726-7 marriage of Tabatha Rice and Nathanel Oke; it is the same record as p. 293, indexed twice, so it is one witness, not two. Whether these are our people: as on p. 293, Likely, not Confirmed: the widow Mary is the tree's Mary (Holloway) Oak on name, status, date, place and the tree's marriage to Thomas Rice; the page does not name her first husband. Nathanel and Tabatha are the tree's Nathaniel Oak (b. 1703) and Tabitha Rice by names and date.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); vitalrecordsofma01marl.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Confirmed. No day or month is printed; the record does not say 'Jr.' or name a wife: the link of this Thomas (b. 1683) to Mary Oakes is Ward's (p. 23) (Likely).
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); vitalrecordsofma00marl.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch.
Keep in mind: A printed transcription of the town's record, not the manuscript.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); vitalrecordsofwe01west.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Confirmed as printed. The record does not name the widow's first husband or her maiden name. That the 1744 bride is Mary (Holloway) Oak Rice rests on Parkman's diary of 26 Apr 1744 (the bride's grandson Jonathan Oake and her son George) and is Likely, not stated; the Fay Genealogy (1898) never names Mary Rice as a wife of John Fay, so the identification of the groom is Unconfirmed.
Image details
![Vital Records of Marlborough, Massachusetts, p. 304 (under RICE): Thomas and [Wid.] Mary Oake of Westbrough, 2 Jul 1722.](/media/e53df448f2cad/display.jpg)
Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); vitalrecordsofma00marl.
How it is shown: Complete page as supplied; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Printed transcription; the library's text index read, image not viewed. The second marriage of Mary (Holloway) Oake; the entry on p. 293 is held separately.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); genealogicalhist00ward.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Confirmed. Ward's 'in the year 1683' is itself in quotation marks: his source is the Marlborough record (p. 161 of its Vital Records). The link between that Thomas and Mary Oakes is Ward's (Likely).
Image details
They had two children, Melliscent, born on April 15, 1723, and Asa, born on August 8, 1726. On December 31, 1727, the Westborough church record says that "Thomas Rice junr & Mary his Wife confessed their Sin of fornication, were restored & Admitted into our Communion & their son Asa & their Daughter Melliscent were baptized." Melliscent was born 287 days after the wedding, and no source explains the confession. On July 7, 1728, the same church baptized "George Oake, the Son of Mary Rice (by her former Husband Oake)." George was one of the eight children named in the 1722 guardianship, and the entry ties Mary Rice to Nathaniel's family in the church's words.

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); vitalrecordsofwe01west.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Confirmed. This is the record that names 'Thomas, Jr.' and Mary as Asa's parents; Mary is taken to be Mary (Holloway) Oak (Likely, via Ward p. 60). Asa and Catherine are not in the tree.
Image details
By August 1736 Parkman was calling her a widow, and on August 2, 1738 his diary has "The widow Rice (heretofore Oake) here," identifying her by both married names. The 1858 Rice genealogy says only that Thomas "moved away" after two children, without saying where. Later family records appear to identify Melliscent Rice as the bride of Edmund Parmenter at Marlborough on January 11, 1747/8, and Asa Rice as the husband of Elizabeth Livermore.

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); genealogicalhist00ward.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Confirmed. Ward says nothing of Mary's later marriage to John Fay and records no death for Thomas Rice Jr. George's 1728 date is a baptism, not a birth.
Image details

Source: Internet Archive (public-domain scan); genealogicalhist00ward.
How it is shown: Complete page as scanned; no crop, no retouch, no search highlight.
Keep in mind: Confirmed. Ward gives Meliscent b. 15 Apr 1723 but m. 11 Jan 1727-8 (age 4): an internal oddity flagged, not resolved. The page does not mention a later marriage of Mary to John Fay.
Image details
Deacon John Fay, 1744
On April 26, 1744, Parkman and his wife "rode over with Captain Fay to Lieutenant Holloways where the Captain was marry'd to the widow Mary Rice, and we had an handsome Entertainment." Westborough's marriage record enters "Mary wid. and Deac. John Fay," so the captain and the deacon were one man. He was probably the John Fay born at Marlborough on November 30, 1669, which made him seventy-four to Mary's sixty-two. The lieutenant whose house hosted the wedding was probably her brother William.
The same diary entry carries a piece of family news. "The Bride's Grandson Jonathan Oake, who was before Lame and one-eyed has lately met with another Maim, his Uncle George having accidentally Splitt his Hand from the Finger to the wrist." The uncle is probably Mary's son George, who married Lydia Eager on October 23, 1744. The grandson is a different Jonathan from her son Jonathan, born in 1717, and no record found so far says whose child he was.
John Fay's marriage to Mary lasted under four years. On January 5, 1747/8, Parkman wrote, "Heard that Captain Fay is Dead," and on January 8 he and his wife went to the funeral of a man he called "such a pious, useful, good tempered man, and the principal Deacon in the Church."
A nurse in the Parkman house, 1749
Mary appears once more. On January 27, 1749, the diary says that "Thomas brought the widow Mary Fay to nurse, and she watch'd," and the editors' note reads "The widow of Captain John Fay." Entries naming her run to March 3, and on February 28 Parkman calls the nurse "Mrs. Rice." The entries appear to describe one stay, in the house where she had been asked to keep house in 1736. On March 7 Parkman writes, "I carried her to her son Benjamin Fays," which names a Fay as her son; as the widow of Captain Fay she would have been his stepmother, so he is probably a stepson. She was sixty-seven.
What is missing
No record of Mary's death or burial has been found. The Westborough and Northborough vital-record pages searched for Fay deaths do not name her, and the March 1749 entry is the last mention so far. The 1906 Oak register says only that she died after 1733; Parkman's diary carries her life forward to 1749.
Parkman's later diary entries and the probate records of her sons George and John may carry her story further.
Sources
- Concord, Massachusetts: Births, Marriages, and Deaths, 1635-1850 (1895): Mary's birth, p. 25; marriage of Adam Holloway and Hannah Farrar, p. 24; Nathaniel Oakes and Mary Haleway, p. 60, March 2, 1703 (page image); marriage of Jonathan Furbush, p. 64.
- Middlesex County, Mass., probate papers, cases 16185 and 16186 (1721-1722): inventory, administration and guardian's bond, film 007553698, frames 766-782.
- Vital Records of Marlborough, Massachusetts, pp. 69, 142, 265, 293, 294, 304 (pages 142 and 293 are among the page images on Mary's person page); Vital Records of Westborough, Massachusetts, pp. 80-81, 87, 89, 191, 201, 249, 251; Vital Records of Northborough, p. 139.
- Westborough Church Records (Colonial Society of Massachusetts): December 31, 1727 and July 7, 1728. www.colonialsociety.org/node/3844
- Ebenezer Parkman, diary, August 12, 1736; August 2, 1738; April 26, 1744; January 5 and 8, 1747/8; January 27 to March 7, 1749 (Ebenezer Parkman Project). diary.ebenezerparkman.org/
- Andrew H. Ward, A Genealogical History of the Rice Family (1858), pp. 23, 60-61; Farrar genealogy (1853), pp. 4-5.
- H. L. Oak, Oak-Oaks-Oakes: Family Register (1906). Public domain; read the whole book: PDF, from the Internet Archive. J. A. Ellis in Genealogical and Family History of the County of Jefferson, New York (1905), vol. I, pp. 144-145.
- Fay Genealogy (1898), pp. 16, 21; De Forest, History of Westborough (1891), p. 210; Kent, Northborough History (1921), p. 238.
The attack at Goodnow's garrison, August 1707 is told separately, along with the later household assignment that names Nathaniel Oakes. The full account of Nathaniel is on Nathaniel Oak and the cabin-boy story, their son William's death is told in William Oake and the fire at Shrewsbury, and the searches made for them are summarized on the research log.